A group of 25 passengers have written to the CEO of Aurigny, Nico Bezuidenhout, pictured top (inset), relaying their experiences while trying to fly from Guernsey to Birmingham last weekend.
You can read the letter in full below:
Dear Nico
Re: Flight Numbers GR 702 and GR704, collective letter from 25 passengers
On behalf of twenty-five passengers of your airline, which we cannot attribute the word service too, we would like to give you a story, it is a sad story and one that will be hard to believe could happen in Guernsey an affluent island which prides itself on customer service.
We will start, as with all fairy tales, at the very beginning. Our journey starts on Friday 18th February, on a wet and windy night. We arrived as directed at the airport for our flight from Guernsey to Birmingham GR 704. We were informed the flight was delayed due to the terrible weather conditions, all assembled passengers were totally understanding and accepting of the delays.
The atmosphere in the café and airport was one of camaraderie and Bonomi. We were told to expect an update at 7pm. 7pm came and went with no update. A very garbled message was heard at 7.30pm. The next update was scheduled for 8pm. Still the atmosphere remained positive. 8pm came and went. At 9.10pm it was announced the flight had been cancelled and we were to make our way to the check in desks which the good citizens and visitors to Guernsey duly did.
At the check in desks, we then waited for a further 50 minutes before being able to reschedule our flight. When asked what time we could expect an outcome for no one was able to say. Several passengers departed the airport rather than waiting for the check in desk to open. The check in desk staff we have to say were very apologetic and almost as distressed as those of us waiting in the queue.
It is from here that the litany of unbelievable events in this fairy tale have taken place, which we have bullet pointed below:
Flight GY704
Flight GY702
A draft copy of this story tale was sent to the passengers on the coach. Their responses and/or additional comments received from sending the draft copy of this letter to the ‘Birmingham 25’, as we consider ourselves now, are provided below:
Passengers 1 and 2
Aurigny has no landing slot in Birmingham on Saturday
So, it was unlikely they were ever going to take us there.
We asked if they could fly to East Midlands airport instead and they laughed at us.
The pilot was complicit in Aurigny’s dishonesty telling us they were expecting a bank of bad weather. He said, "we will get you to the other side of the water then we will leave you in Gatwick." - Which is exactly what they did.
Passengers 3,4,5 and 6
The only thing I would add is that it wasn’t the weather in Birmingham as why we ended up in Gatwick but that they wanted crew to be able to bring the jet back more quickly and try and catch up on those delays from the day before and have another plane there to bring more people over.
So, no consideration given to us to get us to our destination.
We hope this letter elicits a response and gets all passengers somewhere with it regarding an apology and recompense
The situation still makes me cross - how they lied and treated us like 2nd class citizens, no communication, no refreshments, and the way in which we were all totally abandoned by Aurigny at Gatwick.
My two children aged 11 and 14 were emotionally distressed and cried from the stress of the situation
Passengers 7 and 8
The draft letter is spot on
Passengers 9, 10, 11 and 12
We had visited our parents in Guernsey
Our parents are now seriously worried we will not come back and visit them due to the debacle we have endured
Our six-year-old was deeply distressed, he is autistic, so where was the disability assistance and compassion
We had a two and a half child, no refreshments or toilet stops
We will not be using Aurigny for the foreseeable future
On coach mum was near to tears
We were with around ten people whilst the others were a few metres away, unbeknown to our group, it was only when my husband and another passenger met when asking for the duty manager that we were able to amalgamate. The potential for the coach to have leave with passengers left behind was considerable given no Aurigny representative checked anyone on or off the coach
Passengers 13 and 14
The draft letter really encapsulates what a nightmare the last 24 hours were. The only additional point/s I would like to add are:
Whilst waiting at passport control because my partner had a driver’s license, one of the security staff asked who was escorting us through the airport. We obviously said no one.
She then asked again to confirm we were from Guernsey and basically said it was a security breach as we should not have been there.
They, the security staff had not been informed to expect us.
The security operative said she wouldn’t be able to let us through until it had been followed up.
Luckily, I had my passport so I went ahead of my partner and got our bags whilst he waited to go through.
NB: the passenger who asked for the duty manager who met up with passenger 9 was informed that they, the duty manager, could not assist all the Guernsey passengers with the coach issue as she was required to go to passenger control for a security incident. One would guess this was the same situation described here by passengers 13/14 and just compounds the incompetence of Aurigny
Passengers 15 and 16
I think the draft letter has covered all the main points.
My colleague and myself are possibly the minority of passengers on the flight that live in England. We were not given any options or guidance on where we would stay form Aurigny
Instead, we received a shrug of the shoulders and the Aurigny operative said something like ‘I’ve no room at my house’
We called a hotel ourselves and reserved 2 rooms
Getting a taxi was the main problem as airport staff seemed eager to empty the building and lock up.
Aurigny staff gave us 1 number to call which was fully booked.
I called 2 more – also fully booked.
A taxi did eventually drove up which wasn’t booked and he agreed to take us, and he checked arrivals to see if anyone else needed transport. 1 lady did and we took her on route.
Going forward our company needs reassurance from Aurigny as BHX seem very low on the list of priorities when decisions are made.
Would we benefit from alternative arrangements? i.e.. Fly from Manchester or Southampton?
Additional comments from one group of passengers on a ski holiday sent the following through:
It’s quite funny - the friends we are skiing with flew out on Saturday to Gatwick. Initially their 7am flight was delayed to 2-45pm due to the jet not getting back to Guernsey the night before and crew hours. Their flight left earlier than initially advised on the plane we had been transported to Gatwick on which returned from Gatwick and transported them over to Gatwick! Lies and more lies from them. It gives you no faith in Aurigny.
As a post note we would also like to add a recommendation that when Aurigny sends passengers to a different airport please have the where for all to use different scripts to those of the standardised ones. Being told by the crew as we landed in an airport not of our choosing, we had arrived at our destination and to have a safe onward trip and enjoy our time etc., was to say the least insulting to our intelligence. At least have the decency to adlib or have an alternative script apologising for the disturbances regarding flight changes we had experienced and then wish us safe onward passage.
As the CEO of Aurigny and on behalf of all 27 passengers on Flight GY702 we would like not only your personal apology but total reimbursement for the expenditure incurred. The level of incompetence is not as we suspect will be floated the weather but a complete lack of customer service, honesty, and competency. As many have stated we have been held hostage by Aurigny as it is the only airline to afford transportation off island. Many have stated they will not use the airline again.
Throughout the experience from GY704 and GY702 we have been provided with miscommunication, treated as second class citizens, and discounted by your representatives, and as previously stated we hold you personally accountable. From a personal perspective we have taken the decision, at a great cost to ourselves, to move our next Aurigny flight forward twenty-four hours because of the issues experienced because we cannot trust the airline will have us where we need to be for a connecting flight.
We travelled because we have a funeral to attend and thus could not, not take the flight. Many of our co-travellers also had commitments and equally had to travel. As a fairy tale this is a tale of mental distress, loss of trust, and communication inadequacies all of which has led to a collaborative loss of faith in Aurigny.
We the twenty-five passengers require recompense for the debacle and inadequate way in which we have been treated by and from Aurigny. We await your response, to all email addresses included in this missive. We would urge honesty in the provision of your response, honesty we can accept the perceived deception incurred to date we cannot. We urge compassion, and accountability to afford restoration in our faith of Aurigny with an appropriate recompense.
From a quality perspective may we suggest investing in customer service training, the availability of a duty manager who has suitable and sufficient customer services skills and someone who takes ownership and can offer updated accurate information for the future.
This letter has been completed on behalf of the Birmingham flight GY702 who were transported by coach and titled themselves the Birmingham 25. There were considerably more passengers on Flight GY 704 who did not present for the flight change on Saturday morning and several passengers who chose to not take the coach option and remained in Gatwick. We are sure you will receive individual letters from those individuals, as several of the Birmingham 25 have identified they will write individual letters as well as this amalgamated letter. The rationale for this letter being the hope that a collective letter will elicit a response. A copy of this letter is being provided to Deputy Ferbrache, the Guernsey Press and the Bailiwick Press to support that hope.
On behalf of 25 passengers
SE and AS Duff
cc: Deputy Ferbrache