"Limitations" and "frustrations" with the police complaints law will be addressed in a policy letter being brought to the States by the Committee for Home Affairs.
Work is being done to review the law, which Home Affairs believes will "promote confidence in the complaints process". It wants to make sure the public receives reassurance that concerns are listened to and acted upon appropriately.
While the Committee reaffirms its position that the police are the most appropriate body to deal with complaints against officers, it accepts that the Police Complaints Commission's role should be expanded.
"We have an excellent police service but it is a fact that when dealing with the sorts of very challenging matters officers have to on a daily basis, there will be occasions where members of the public they have encountered will feel aggrieved or have cause to submit a complaint," said the President of Home Affairs, Deputy Rob Prow.
"The police would acknowledge that it’s impossible for them to always get everything right, so it’s incredibly important that we have a robust process in place so that all parties can have confidence that complaints are addressed fairly. It’s important to both the committee and police for public trust to be maintained and our current legislation was agreed 16 years ago so is overdue for a review.
"It is important to highlight that a complaint in and of itself is not a sign of wrongdoing, which in a small community like Guernsey I know it can be misconstrued or reported as such. People have an absolute right to submit complaints, about service delivery or the conduct of officers, and that must always be maintained. We must ensure that legitimate complaints are robustly investigated. However, there is no current mechanism for an initial assessment of complaints to be made to establish the validity of the complaint, or for example if it is vexatious, as there is in other jurisdictions such as the UK. The Committee’s proposals will seek to address this.
"We also strongly believe that the Committee should not have an active role in the complaints process and convene as the “Appropriate Authority”, as under the current law we are required to oversee the process for complaints against senior officers. We think this responsibility should be removed from the Committee so there is greater independence."
Comments
Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.