Monday 10 May 2021
Select a region
News

Sure and JT reached secret agreement "with the object of preventing competition", says regulator

Sure and JT reached secret agreement

Thursday 22 April 2021

Sure and JT reached secret agreement "with the object of preventing competition", says regulator


Sure and JT agreed that JT would pull out of operating 4G and future 5G mobile networks in Guernsey, in return for Sure doing the same in Jersey, according to an investigation by the island's competition watchdog. The provisional findings are being contested by the two companies.

The Guernsey Competition and Regulatory Authority [GCRA] says the mobile network providers infringed Guernsey’s competition law "by entering into an agreement that had the object of preventing competition within Guernsey."

In a statement on Wednesday afternoon, the GCRA said the two companies had colluded "through a coordinated exchange of information between JT and Sure over more than a year".

"Sure and JT colluded by sharing commercial information and agreeing secretly that JT would pull out of operating existing 4G and future 5G mobile networks in Guernsey, in return for Sure doing the same in Jersey," the provisional judgment states. 

"This agreement to trade mobile network infrastructure would have given each of JT and Sure a far stronger position as mobile network providers in their home island achieved not by fair and open competition but through a secret anti-competitive arrangement."

Screenshot_2021-04-21_at_16.18.15.png

Pictured: The information note published on the Guernsey Competition and Regulatory Authority's website. 

Alistair Beak, Acting Group Chief Executive Officer of Sure, revealed the operator's intention to "defend ourselves rigorously" following the GCRA's assertions. 

Mr Beak added that Sure was unhappy with how the investigation had been handled, saying it had been conducted in a "manifestly unfair" way. 

“We have received this morning the draft decision from the GCRA, which we will be considering in detail," he said. "As a responsible operator we strongly refute the allegations of anti-competitive behaviour made by the GCRA and will be defending ourselves rigorously. 

“We must also express our concerns regarding the way in which the GCRA has conducted this investigation, which we believe has been manifestly unfair. We are committed to ensuring that the Guernsey telecoms market is fair and open and that we operate in the best interests of consumers.”

A JT spokesperson stated the company's belief that the GCRA has reached "incorrect" interim conclusions. 

"We are proud that the telecoms market in Guernsey is one of the island’s most competitive, providing benefit to the whole community," said the spokesperson. 

“We believe that our pro-competitive stance speaks for itself, and that the GCRA has reached the incorrect interim conclusions in this important matter. We will continue to co-operate fully with their investigation, ahead of their decision being finalised. 

“For the record, JT has repeatedly demonstrated its appetite to compete legally, ethically and fairly across the Channel Islands, and that’s exactly what we will continue to do."

Sign up to newsletter

 

Comments

Once your comment has been submitted, it won’t appear immediately. There is no need to submit it more than once. Comments are published at the discretion of Bailiwick Publishing, and will include your username.

Posted by Robert Williams on
The agreement seems to make sense as the islands individually are too small to make competition viable. Similar with the Aurigny/Blue Islands co-ordination.
This competition authority appears to think that the Channel Islands are a huge country rather than small dots on the map.
To place a comment please login

You have landed on the Bailiwick Express website, however it appears you are based in . Would you like to stay on the site, or visit the site?